Coming Soon - New Premium Features - Page 2

patos · 08-08-2007, 10:47 PM

how about the option of controlling the codecs on the server side? have you discarded it?

haifischjunge · 08-09-2007, 12:20 PM

if codecs would be selected on the server side, it would be great, if we could have something like an account extension for mobile use, so voxalot tries to ring my home phone with full bandwight codecs and my mobile phone with the low ones.

i think the next problem requiring ota or a sisx config is that on most nokia handsets (not sure if not all) voip over umts is disabled and could only be enabled with the above mentioned meanings.

btw. it would be also great to have a lo-fi version of the new voxalot voicemail system to use is directly on my phones browser.

Mesmer · 08-10-2007, 04:04 PM

Thanks Martin,

Could "Number Has No Caller ID" be added to the incoming fowarding options?

juancarlos · 08-11-2007, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martin

Hi,

Within the next day or 2 we will be releasing a couple of new enhancements to our premium service.

.

Hi Martin

you mentioned 1 or 2 days.. but it is not 3 and I can not see any changes. Has this been implemented ?

martin · 08-11-2007, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by juancarlos

Hi Martin

you mentioned 1 or 2 days.. but it is not 3 and I can not see any changes. Has this been implemented ?

Very soon. We decided to upgrade the database before releasing these new features.
.

shezad · 08-11-2007, 10:57 AM

About when will you upgrade the database ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by martin

Very soon. We decided to upgrade the database before releasing these new features.
.

juancarlos · 08-11-2007, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shezad

About when will you upgrade the database ?

database was upgraded yesterday i think... So I guess soon will come the new features

shezad · 08-13-2007, 08:23 AM

Hi Martin

what about putting callforwarding active also with seconds that you can choose from 1 to 180 second, meaning if there is no reply on the voip phone the call gets activated to your callforwarding function.

Is it possible in the future ? Does this sound stupid ?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
VoXaLot Premium - Please Vote	martin	Voxalot Support	12	01-31-2008 02:36 AM
Query about Voxalot Premium	BlueDream	Voxalot General	7	07-31-2007 10:19 PM
Coming Soon - New CFWD and speed dial features	martin	Voxalot Support	31	02-24-2007 05:01 PM
Premium call route option now available	evilbunny	e164.org Support	0	03-29-2006 11:46 PM

08-08-2007, 10:47 PM	#11
patos Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 20 Thanks: 3 Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts	how about the option of controlling the codecs on the server side? have you discarded it?

08-09-2007, 12:20 PM	#12
haifischjunge Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Vienna, Austria Posts: 56 Thanks: 5 Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts	if codecs would be selected on the server side, it would be great, if we could have something like an account extension for mobile use, so voxalot tries to ring my home phone with full bandwight codecs and my mobile phone with the low ones. i think the next problem requiring ota or a sisx config is that on most nokia handsets (not sure if not all) voip over umts is disabled and could only be enabled with the above mentioned meanings. btw. it would be also great to have a lo-fi version of the new voxalot voicemail system to use is directly on my phones browser.

08-10-2007, 04:04 PM	#13
Mesmer Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 16 Thanks: 1 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts	Thanks Martin, Could "Number Has No Caller ID" be added to the incoming fowarding options?

08-13-2007, 08:23 AM	#18
shezad Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 162 Thanks: 9 Thanked 1 Times in 1 Posts	Hi Martin what about putting callforwarding active also with seconds that you can choose from 1 to 180 second, meaning if there is no reply on the voip phone the call gets activated to your callforwarding function. Is it possible in the future ? Does this sound stupid ?