Click Here To Visit SIP Broker  

Go Back   Voxalot / SIP Broker Support Forums > Voxalot Forums > Voxalot Support

Voxalot Support Support for the Voxalot service.

 
 
Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-13-2008, 06:50 PM   #11
boatman
Senior Member
 
boatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 365
Thanks: 17
Thanked 77 Times in 64 Posts
boatman is on a distinguished road
Default

I believe the problem will be solved if the two ATAs can be made to send RTP packets directly to each other. I don't know why the ATAs are not already doing that during a Voxalot to Voxalot call.
boatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-14-2008, 05:15 AM   #12
Tranworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 128
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Tranworld is on a distinguished road
Default But what about Nokia?

It may or may not but even then it is a partial solution because I am also using a Nokia E51 with its build in VoIP stack, not much can be configured there. Looks like I have to use the long route via provider, in itself not a problem for me and does not reduce the Voxalot real benefits, just perplexing why that is so. Thanks for helping anyway
Tranworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-14-2008, 05:26 AM   #13
boatman
Senior Member
 
boatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 365
Thanks: 17
Thanked 77 Times in 64 Posts
boatman is on a distinguished road
Default

I have been experimenting here. It seems that Voxalot will give the calling party the direct route only if the receiving party's NAT traversal settings are a set certain way. If Voxalot detects incorrect NAT traversal settings on the receiving end, then it forces the RTP packets through the Voxalot proxy server (this is what's happening in your case), presumably this is done in order to successfully complete the call, whereas some other VSPs might connect you but you would have one-way audio or no audio.
boatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-17-2008, 06:16 PM   #14
boatman
Senior Member
 
boatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 365
Thanks: 17
Thanked 77 Times in 64 Posts
boatman is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tranworld View Post
Looks like I have to use the long route via provider, in itself not a problem for me and does not reduce the Voxalot real benefits, just perplexing why that is so...
Martin has confirmed what I suspected about the NAT traversal settings having something to do with getting a direct RTP connection. See his post here.

If you wish to test for mis-configured NAT traversal settings you can call this SIP number: *0@proxy01.sipphone.com . The easiest way to call that number may be to place it into one of the ATA's Speed Dial slots, "Speed Dial 9" for example, then press 9# to dial the number. If the test says "you may experience problems behind this router" then you know you have mis-configured NAT traversal settings.
boatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-18-2008, 12:57 AM   #15
emoci
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 123
Thanked 369 Times in 282 Posts
emoci is a name known to allemoci is a name known to allemoci is a name known to allemoci is a name known to all
Default

First of all thanks boatman for taking the time to look into this thoroughly...

As a sidenote, instead of calling the SIP URI, you can also call *747*0 to reach the testing facility at SipPhone
emoci is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-18-2008, 02:46 AM   #16
boatman
Senior Member
 
boatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 365
Thanks: 17
Thanked 77 Times in 64 Posts
boatman is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emoci View Post
As a side note, instead of calling the SIP URI, you can also call *747*0 to reach the testing facility at SipPhone
I would suggest sticking with the fundamental test number, *0@proxy01.sipphone.com. The *747*0 method works only if NAT settings are correct, however if certain NAT settings are incorrect (such as 'NAT Mapping Enable' = no in a PAP2) then no message will be heard and the caller may wonder what happened to the expected voice announcement.
boatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-24-2008, 07:44 PM   #17
boatman
Senior Member
 
boatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 365
Thanks: 17
Thanked 77 Times in 64 Posts
boatman is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tranworld View Post
How can we explain that? surely I would have expected that the Voxalot to Voxalot call, cutting out Pfingo, to produce the clearest sound, but the reverse is happening which I can't understand
Hi Tranworld,

After reading this post by emoci, I realized that your poor quality audio issue can probably be solved by following these instructions.
boatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Voxalot and Sipura/ATA Tutorial: A Comprehensive Walkthrough ctylor Voxalot General 5 04-28-2010 12:52 AM
Can't get voice packets to bypass VoXaLot v164 Voxalot Support 35 08-23-2009 10:25 PM
Call Quality and Voxalot shibukraj Voxalot Support 1 12-01-2006 03:39 AM
SPA3K / Voice Mail Problem BJReplay Voxalot Support 3 07-05-2006 09:09 AM
Newbie - but please be nice Mallycat Voxalot Support 21 04-15-2006 07:50 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.