![]() |
|
Voxalot Support Support for the Voxalot service. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
Thanks: 3 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts ![]() |
![]() I've recently aquired a Netgear WGR615V wireless VOIP router.
In configuring for VOXALOT I seem to be having a problem in finding the correct and/or optimum setting for the SIP registration. Looking at the tutorial I see a 900 seconds, thats way too long as calls end up in voice mail. I tried 600 from a thread here, still too long, calls in voice mail... I put in a 300 and that seems to be better, but its still loosing registration and calls go to voice mail.... If I unregister and re-register the provider things are back to ringing the phone. So what is the CORRECT and/or OPTIMUM SIP Registration Timeout and SIP Registration Head Start Settings for VOXALOT?? Next Dial Plans....I reviewed the "tutorial" on them here and it was not very helpful. The WGR615V has NO UNIT dial plan settings. I dial 500 to get VM not *500. What I am looking for is help with dial plans to send calls to FWD, sipgate.co.uk, VBuzzer (internal numbers), voipuser to route the SIP internal numbers that route for free to each of these providers. Sorting this all out will need to be done by the dial plans at voxalot. Is there a better tutorial that can help with this as the present one just doesn't sink in it just starts to read like wahahah whaahahahaha like on Charlie Brown. So I can dial someting like *2 and what ever after gets sent to FWD, and *3 gets sent to sipgate, etc.. I am only talking about the free VOIP calls that each allows. No outbound PTSN calls will be made. Hints, pointers, tutorials, online testers??? Thanks in advance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
![]() |
![]() Quote:
2. Then you have to check whether your device allows to pass * or # at the beginning of a number and if it passes them over correctly to Voxalot. 3. Create dial plans in Voxalot. See my post here for details. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
Thanks: 3 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts ![]() |
![]() Quote:
With the exception of the freespeches.co.uk|ie either blocking or something else these are all done (FWD, VBuzzer, VOIPUSER, SIPGATE) Quote:
I have no way to know unless theres a test. Quote:
Ok... some quick testing..... I've setup 9*01 to FWD, 9*02 to Sipgate, etc... They seem to be working well.. I get the VM for SipGate on 50000, and the echo test on 713 for FWD... |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Member
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() If you have less then 10 providers you even can leave the "0" out (9*01) so you end up in a two digit prefix and again save another digit to dial... ![]() Of course again don't forget to change the Replacement to ${EXTEN:2} BTW: The ultimate solution would be to convince the users you are calling to register their PSTN numbers with an ENUM service (like www.e164.org). You then could dial their regular phone numbers and Voxalot would resolve them to the respective SIP URI... ![]() Use the ENUM Replacement field in the dial plan to perform the lookup. E164 number format is CCAAANNNNN (CC=country code, AAA= area prefix, NNNNN= phone number). gambrinus Last edited by gambrinus; 05-19-2007 at 09:40 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
Thanks: 3 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts ![]() |
![]() Ummm... well its solved in that I have a way to send numbers to specific providers now.... The whole bigger picture of dial plans... is .... "less murky." To be the most robust and simplelest I still need to figure out a way that if you use the SIPGate Assigned UK PTSN number v. the SIPGATE SIP ID number to send it to them. Attempting to dial a non SIPGATE VOIP number ie: a real UK PTSN number should fail as I don't pay for that option. Quote:
The so called "tutorial" I am afraid is not very tutorial, maybe if you've spent the last 20 years in a cave with SIP it makes sense. A better tutorial on the whole dial plan thing would be great and then I could probably come up with some rules to sort out FWD #'s v. SIPGATE ones etc.. Quote:
The problem with ENUM is giving out phone numbers to a database that could potentially be misused. I don't give out my private numbers to 99% of the world so having it in some database its not going to fly. Most of the people I deal with are the same way. My privacy is very critical to me. The potential to misuse ENUM to find unlisted numbers is just not acceptable to most of my user base. Thanks for the de-murking of some of the dial plan stuff. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
Thanks: 3 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts ![]() |
![]() Well the WGR615V will NOT pass a LEADING *, immediate fast busy.
A leading # and it does nothing....which makes sense in that it thinks I'm done. No big deal, as if you have to hit 9 then select a carrier that makes sense in a twisted PBX'esque way. On a side note heres an interesting idea for the WGR615V's broadband help » Forums » Up and Running » VOIP Tech Chat » [Unlock] Asterisk on Netgear WGR615V VoIP router? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
![]() |
![]() Quote:
One could break in the mail server to steal all "valid" mail adresses. But spammers simply send out bulks of mails to all possible combinations of digits and letters and once they don't receive a "user unknown" error message from the server they know they hit a valid address. Without knowing your phone number I can't do anything with ENUM. And why should a hacker try to break in the ENUM DNS Server when it is most easy to automatically try calling a whole IP address range? Or 000000-999999@voxalot.com. Or 0000000-9999999@sipgate.co.uk... ENUM is NOT the white pages (unless you explicitly want to). ENUM is a great help for all VoIP users!!! Given the fact that with an automated dialling machine I will get through to you as well as if I break into the E164.org DNS server to steal all "valid" routes. I heard about the first possibility, it is being used daily, but I never heard about the latter (correct me if wrong!)... so for me it seems a little bit paranoic what you say... ![]() But this is now getting OT... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|