VoXaLot Now Supports SIP Registrations - Page 6

ctylor · 06-03-2006, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Any chance you have Vbuzzer set to forward incoming calls to VoXaLot? If so, that could account for how Vbuzzer calls are arriving at VoXaLot without a registration.

Ron

No, good question but I never set up anything like that. I think Vbuzzer is registered (that is what I am telling Voxalot to do afterall) and that I am one of the 11 voxalot users that Martin said has vbuzzer showing as 'registered' to them. I've had Vbuzzer set that way for a week now.

Ron · 06-03-2006, 05:19 AM

ctylor,

Incoming Vbuzzer calls don't work for me either through VoXaLot.

If I disable VoXaLot's SIP registration with Vbuzzer (giving plenty of time for it to expire), I can register a PAP2 or my Asterisk server with Vbuzzer and receive incoming calls as expected.

When I register VoXaLot with Vbuzzer, incoming calls fail in a variety of ways depending on where the call originated from. I'm confident I'm successfully registered with Vbuzzer from VoXaLot because outgoing calls fail if registration is not enabled (a known characteristic of Vbuzzer).

Ron

martin · 06-03-2006, 05:21 AM

We just made a minor tweak to hopefully resolve these registration issues. Are you able to re-test?

Thanks

ctylor · 06-03-2006, 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martin

We just made a minor tweak to hopefully resolve these registration issues. Are you able to re-test?

Thanks

Success! Call from Gizmo Project to user@vbuzzer.com:80 now rings my ATA as desired/expected. Thank you Martin.

Ron · 06-03-2006, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martin

We just made a minor tweak to hopefully resolve these registration issues. Are you able to re-test?

I don't believe I'm seeing any difference.

I have an FWD number set to forward to my Vbuzzer account.

If I call the FWD number from Gizmo Project's Sip Broker access (011-747-*393-767429), FWD's voicemail answers immediately.

If I call the FWD number from another FWD number, I go into an echo mode briefly and then everything just dies.

If I call the FWD number from VoXaLot's Sip Broker access (*393-767429), FWD's voicemail answers immediately.

If I call the FWD number via Sip Broker PSTN access, I get a normal (not fast) busy (but everything I try to call through Sip Broker PSTN access tonight gets a normal busy).

If I register a PAP2 (instead of VoXaLot) with Vbuzzer, calls made to the FWD number go through to the PAP2 properly.

Ron

Ron · 06-03-2006, 07:18 AM

Based on ctylor's report, I forwarded my Gizmo Project number to Vbuzzer, and everything worked as expected. Apparently there is an unexpected quirk with FWD.

Switching gears...

While monitoring SIP registration status at SIPphone, I noticed that the registration is being made on port 5061 (at least according to SIPphone) even though I specified port 5060 on the VoXaLot Provider page. Is the port number negotiable during SIP registration such that this difference is normal?

Ron

martin · 06-03-2006, 07:38 AM

Not to my knowledge. Could it be referring to voxalot.com:5061 as that is where our registrations come from?

Ron · 06-03-2006, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martin

Not to my knowledge. Could it be referring to voxalot.com:5061 as that is where our registrations come from?

Could be, the status line isn't overly wordy.

Ron

richard · 06-03-2006, 03:04 PM

Hi Martin

Here is an update on my tests.

Sipphone - Success MOS 4.195313 Almost no delay
FWD - Success MOS 4.195313 Almost no delay
Sipgate.co.uk - Success MOS 4.195313 Almost no delay
Eutelia.it - Success MOS 4.195313 Almost no delay

Now vBuzzer is a different story, here are its results:

vBuzzer - Fails (Bell Type Recording - Number not avail. etc.)

Then I registered vBuzzer with my ATA on the PSTN Line and the results were:

vBuzzer - Voxalot rings on my ATA (Line 1)!!!, but conversation is
one-way only (Voxalot registered SIP can hear caller but
caller cannot hear me).

It seems clear that vBuzzer WANTS to be registered before it gets transfered to Voxalot, but I don't understand why it isn't considering itself appropriately registered under the PROVIDER functionality on Voxalot and requires me to register it elsewhere (my ATA 2nd line or eyeBEAM).

Also, I don't know what's causing the one-way sound :-(

BTW, the other VSPs as I showed above, works, VERY GOOD!!!!

Take care

Richard

richard · 06-03-2006, 11:31 PM

Oh forgot to mention, STANAPHONE also has only one-way audio, but this service is not really that critical to me.

06-03-2006, 05:21 AM	#53
martin Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 2,930 Thanks: 528 Thanked 646 Times in 340 Posts	We just made a minor tweak to hopefully resolve these registration issues. Are you able to re-test? Thanks __________________ Martin Please post support questions on the forum. Do not send PMs unless requested.

06-03-2006, 07:38 AM	#57
martin Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 2,930 Thanks: 528 Thanked 646 Times in 340 Posts	Not to my knowledge. Could it be referring to voxalot.com:5061 as that is where our registrations come from? __________________ Martin Please post support questions on the forum. Do not send PMs unless requested.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Voxalot and Sipura/ATA Tutorial: A Comprehensive Walkthrough	ctylor	Voxalot General	5	04-28-2010 12:52 AM
SPA to Voxalot REDIRects?	Tslam	Voxalot Support	12	11-17-2009 08:25 PM
Can't get voice packets to bypass VoXaLot	v164	Voxalot Support	35	08-23-2009 10:25 PM
VoXaLot not working with PBXes (VoXaLot as an extension of PBXes)	wilsonhlacerda	Voxalot Support	31	12-09-2007 02:30 PM
Which VoXaLot services are B2BUA?	v164	Voxalot Support	6	07-23-2007 01:48 PM

06-03-2006, 05:19 AM	#52
Ron Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 447 Thanks: 4 Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts	ctylor, Incoming Vbuzzer calls don't work for me either through VoXaLot. If I disable VoXaLot's SIP registration with Vbuzzer (giving plenty of time for it to expire), I can register a PAP2 or my Asterisk server with Vbuzzer and receive incoming calls as expected. When I register VoXaLot with Vbuzzer, incoming calls fail in a variety of ways depending on where the call originated from. I'm confident I'm successfully registered with Vbuzzer from VoXaLot because outgoing calls fail if registration is not enabled (a known characteristic of Vbuzzer). Ron

06-03-2006, 07:18 AM	#56
Ron Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 447 Thanks: 4 Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts	Based on ctylor's report, I forwarded my Gizmo Project number to Vbuzzer, and everything worked as expected. Apparently there is an unexpected quirk with FWD. Switching gears... While monitoring SIP registration status at SIPphone, I noticed that the registration is being made on port 5061 (at least according to SIPphone) even though I specified port 5060 on the VoXaLot Provider page. Is the port number negotiable during SIP registration such that this difference is normal? Ron

06-03-2006, 03:04 PM	#59
richard Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 153 Thanks: 37 Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts	Hi Martin Here is an update on my tests. Sipphone - Success MOS 4.195313 Almost no delay FWD - Success MOS 4.195313 Almost no delay Sipgate.co.uk - Success MOS 4.195313 Almost no delay Eutelia.it - Success MOS 4.195313 Almost no delay Now vBuzzer is a different story, here are its results: vBuzzer - Fails (Bell Type Recording - Number not avail. etc.) *Then I registered vBuzzer with my ATA on the PSTN Line and the results were:* vBuzzer - Voxalot rings on my ATA (Line 1)!!!, but conversation is one-way only (Voxalot registered SIP can hear caller but caller cannot hear me). It seems clear that vBuzzer WANTS to be registered before it gets transfered to Voxalot, but I don't understand why it isn't considering itself appropriately registered under the PROVIDER functionality on Voxalot and requires me to register it elsewhere (my ATA 2nd line or eyeBEAM). Also, I don't know what's causing the one-way sound :-( BTW, the other VSPs as I showed above, works, VERY GOOD!!!! Take care Richard

06-03-2006, 11:31 PM	#60
richard Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 153 Thanks: 37 Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts	Oh forgot to mention, STANAPHONE also has only one-way audio, but this service is not really that critical to me.