Voxalot / SIP Broker Support Forums - View Single Post

telenerd · 09-24-2007, 02:22 AM

Hi Martin
Unfortunately that is not the answer I wanted to see. My research led me to believe if the NAT option was YES or ROUTE then the CONTACT URI would be ignored.

So we still do not know why the ACK is not sent to my CONTACT URI when the call originates from the sipbroker PSTN gateway.

Most people will not have a problem if the ACK is sent to the URI that was registred because it is usually the same as the CONTACT obtained from the 200 OK. Not so in my case.

Is there no hope of getting this to work? I believe that RFC3261 is pretty clear that the ACK should be sent to the CONTACT URI derived from 200 OK.

09-24-2007, 02:22 AM	#14
telenerd Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 23 Thanks: 2 Thanked 1 Times in 1 Posts	Hi Martin Unfortunately that is not the answer I wanted to see. My research led me to believe if the NAT option was YES or ROUTE then the CONTACT URI would be ignored. So we still do not know why the ACK is not sent to my CONTACT URI when the call originates from the sipbroker PSTN gateway. Most people will not have a problem if the ACK is sent to the URI that was registred because it is usually the same as the CONTACT obtained from the 200 OK. Not so in my case. Is there no hope of getting this to work? I believe that RFC3261 is pretty clear that the ACK should be sent to the CONTACT URI derived from 200 OK.