Thread: Record-Route: header - is it really necessary?
View Single Post
Unread 07-11-2007, 09:53 AM   #3
v164
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 96
Thanks: 8
Thanked 26 Times in 19 Posts
v164 is a jewel in the roughv164 is a jewel in the rough
Default therefore "Record-Route: " header not necessary
Quote:
Originally Posted by v164 View Post
I have tried out Keiichi Honda's "SIP-IX" service, which does a similar numeric-prefix to SIP domain name connection service.

...

The SIP INVITE message shown in the dial-a-spiral test shows that sipix.jp does not add the "Record-Route:" header.
The point being, that this shows that the "Record-Route: " header should not be necessary for sipbroker.com either.
v164 is offline   Reply With Quote