Click Here To Visit SIP Broker  

Go Back   Voxalot / SIP Broker Support Forums > Voxalot Forums > Voxalot Support

Voxalot Support Support for the Voxalot service.

 
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-18-2007, 11:38 AM   #1
Tslam
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tslam is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martin View Post
You get those bits right and the call will route.
Is that a hypothetical?

What this problem boils down to is that a SPA3102 Gateway sends INVITES with From headers equal to the PSTN caller's CID, instead of its VoIP account. When it's redirected by the destination SIP proxy (such as a SPA942 with Cfwd), it tries to authenticate with this CID. Here is the essential SIP code:

Calling:123456@192.168.1.32:5062
INVITE sip:123456@192.168.1.32:5062
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.31:5061
From: MOBILE <sip:0410000123@au.voxalot.com>
To: <sip:123456@192.168.1.32:5062>
Remote-Party-ID: MOBILE sip:0410000123@au.voxalot.com>;screen=yes;party=ca lling
Contact: Peer1 <sip:0410000123@192.168.1.31:5061>

The Cfwd/REDIR works if there's no incoming CID, or when [PSTN Line]PSTN CID For VoIP CID = No. Effectively this blocks PSTN CID beyond the PSTN gateway, which isn't desireable.

How can PSTN CID and REDIR work together? Is Linksys violating SIP by setting From=PSTN CID, or is Voxalot wrong to authenticate on the From field (presumably not)? How does a Gateway-PBX configuration manage PSTN CID?

I thought of prefixing the CID with a code like 999, but that just throws Voxalot completely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by martin View Post
I can not answer this question as Voxalot has no visibility whatsoever of the client side
Is that your mission statement?
Tslam is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-18-2007, 11:48 AM   #2
martin
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,930
Thanks: 528
Thanked 646 Times in 340 Posts
martin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tslam View Post
Is that your mission statement?
It's a fact Tslam, i've provided you with all the information I can see from the logs.

For a free service I can safely say we have provided you with more support than you would otherwise get from many paid services.
__________________
Martin

Please post support questions on the forum. Do not send PMs unless requested.
martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-18-2007, 01:10 PM   #3
Tslam
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tslam is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martin View Post
For a free service I can safely say we have provided you with more support
Yep I thought you'd say that - you reached a similar conclusion in the recent "Voxalot not working with PBXes" thread.

Anyhow, I don't happen to think Voxalot a really a free service. It's something which you are developing into a commercial franchise; the next Google perhaps. The only thing that's really free is the time we users give you in (unsolicited) development and beta testing.
Tslam is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-18-2007, 09:38 PM   #4
wildbill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cairns - Australia
Posts: 117
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
wildbill is on a distinguished road
Default

Anyhow, I don't happen to think Voxalot a really a free service.
.[/quote]
It's "FREE" to leave - Bill
wildbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-19-2007, 09:44 AM   #5
martin
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,930
Thanks: 528
Thanked 646 Times in 340 Posts
martin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tslam View Post
Yep I thought you'd say that - you reached a similar conclusion in the recent "Voxalot not working with PBXes" thread.
Tslam we do understand your frustration, however it is very difficult to diagnose this sort of problem without having full visibility of the client side setup.

Part of the premium launch will include a support framework that will enable us to provide personalized levels of support.

Right now, our resources are spread thin working on new features and the aforementioned support infrastructure.

We hope you understand.
__________________
Martin

Please post support questions on the forum. Do not send PMs unless requested.
martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2007, 10:35 PM   #6
Tslam
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tslam is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martin View Post
the premium launch will include a support framework that will enable us to provide personalized levels of support
In my opinion this could be a mistake. A global mistake. Think about it.

Last edited by Tslam; 05-05-2007 at 10:39 PM.
Tslam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Voxalot and Sipura/ATA Tutorial: A Comprehensive Walkthrough ctylor Voxalot General 5 04-28-2010 12:52 AM
Can't get voice packets to bypass VoXaLot v164 Voxalot Support 35 08-23-2009 10:25 PM
VoXaLot not working with PBXes (VoXaLot as an extension of PBXes) wilsonhlacerda Voxalot Support 31 12-09-2007 02:30 PM
Which VoXaLot services are B2BUA? v164 Voxalot Support 6 07-23-2007 01:48 PM
Help with Voxalot please ... MrHatken Voxalot Support 6 11-11-2006 03:59 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.