|
Voxalot Support Support for the Voxalot service. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
04-18-2007, 11:38 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts |
Is that a hypothetical?
What this problem boils down to is that a SPA3102 Gateway sends INVITES with From headers equal to the PSTN caller's CID, instead of its VoIP account. When it's redirected by the destination SIP proxy (such as a SPA942 with Cfwd), it tries to authenticate with this CID. Here is the essential SIP code: Calling:123456@192.168.1.32:5062 INVITE sip:123456@192.168.1.32:5062 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.31:5061 From: MOBILE <sip:0410000123@au.voxalot.com> To: <sip:123456@192.168.1.32:5062> Remote-Party-ID: MOBILE sip:0410000123@au.voxalot.com>;screen=yes;party=ca lling Contact: Peer1 <sip:0410000123@192.168.1.31:5061> The Cfwd/REDIR works if there's no incoming CID, or when [PSTN Line]PSTN CID For VoIP CID = No. Effectively this blocks PSTN CID beyond the PSTN gateway, which isn't desireable. How can PSTN CID and REDIR work together? Is Linksys violating SIP by setting From=PSTN CID, or is Voxalot wrong to authenticate on the From field (presumably not)? How does a Gateway-PBX configuration manage PSTN CID? I thought of prefixing the CID with a code like 999, but that just throws Voxalot completely. Is that your mission statement? |
04-18-2007, 11:48 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,930
Thanks: 528 Thanked 646 Times in 340 Posts |
It's a fact Tslam, i've provided you with all the information I can see from the logs.
For a free service I can safely say we have provided you with more support than you would otherwise get from many paid services.
__________________
Martin Please post support questions on the forum. Do not send PMs unless requested. |
04-18-2007, 01:10 PM | #3 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts |
Quote:
Anyhow, I don't happen to think Voxalot a really a free service. It's something which you are developing into a commercial franchise; the next Google perhaps. The only thing that's really free is the time we users give you in (unsolicited) development and beta testing. |
|
04-18-2007, 09:38 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cairns - Australia
Posts: 117
Thanks: 1 Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts |
Anyhow, I don't happen to think Voxalot a really a free service.
.[/quote] It's "FREE" to leave - Bill |
04-19-2007, 09:44 AM | #5 | |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,930
Thanks: 528 Thanked 646 Times in 340 Posts |
Quote:
Part of the premium launch will include a support framework that will enable us to provide personalized levels of support. Right now, our resources are spread thin working on new features and the aforementioned support infrastructure. We hope you understand.
__________________
Martin Please post support questions on the forum. Do not send PMs unless requested. |
|
05-05-2007, 10:35 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts |
In my opinion this could be a mistake. A global mistake. Think about it.
Last edited by Tslam; 05-05-2007 at 10:39 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Voxalot and Sipura/ATA Tutorial: A Comprehensive Walkthrough | ctylor | Voxalot General | 5 | 04-28-2010 12:52 AM |
Can't get voice packets to bypass VoXaLot | v164 | Voxalot Support | 35 | 08-23-2009 10:25 PM |
VoXaLot not working with PBXes (VoXaLot as an extension of PBXes) | wilsonhlacerda | Voxalot Support | 31 | 12-09-2007 02:30 PM |
Which VoXaLot services are B2BUA? | v164 | Voxalot Support | 6 | 07-23-2007 01:48 PM |
Help with Voxalot please ... | MrHatken | Voxalot Support | 6 | 11-11-2006 03:59 PM |