Click Here To Visit SIP Broker  

Go Back   Voxalot / SIP Broker Support Forums > VoIP Related > VoIP News

VoIP News Voice over IP news articles, stories and reviews.

 
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-11-2007, 03:47 PM   #1
tomblandford
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 222
Thanks: 44
Thanked 23 Times in 22 Posts
tomblandford is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to tomblandford
Default UK users - Petition for Naked DSL in UK

Petition to: Force Telecoms companies to offer broadband only line rental (naked DSL).
.
.
tomblandford is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-11-2007, 08:14 PM   #2
andy
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 218
Thanks: 34
Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts
andy will become famous soon enough
Default

I'm not sure if this belongs on here, but I'd better let one of the others decide

By the way, there is a similar petition, with a few more signatures than this.

I don't see how people can have broadband without a phone line, and therefore paying BT for it. Some of the proponents of this idea seem to gloss over that.

Some of them have also claimed that such products exist in USA and Australia. I read replies on one forum that this was untrue for USA; that AT&T are canvassing market opinion, and in any case the monthly fee will be $20 or more. Perhaps some comments about Australia will be added here
andy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-11-2007, 09:12 PM   #3
Juste
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 65
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Juste is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy View Post
I'm not sure if this belongs on here, but I'd better let one of the others decide

By the way, there is a similar petition, with a few more signatures than this.

I don't see how people can have broadband without a phone line, and therefore paying BT for it. Some of the proponents of this idea seem to gloss over that.

Some of them have also claimed that such products exist in USA and Australia. I read replies on one forum that this was untrue for USA; that AT&T are canvassing market opinion, and in any case the monthly fee will be $20 or more. Perhaps some comments about Australia will be added here
It works very well for me. And I do not pay anything extra for having this freedom. My internet provider does not really advertise that, but they have no choice.
Juste is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-12-2007, 02:49 AM   #4
DracoFelis
 
DracoFelis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 188
Thanks: 4
Thanked 64 Times in 41 Posts
DracoFelis is a jewel in the roughDracoFelis is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy View Post
I don't see how people can have broadband without a phone line, and therefore paying BT for it. Some of the proponents of this idea seem to gloss over that.
DSL does require a "phone line", in that you need the physical wire from the phone company. But it's only marketing/rules of the phone company that says you also need "telephone service" on that wire. From a technical standpoint, it's quite possible to have DSL on a "phone line" that doesn't also have "phone service" enabled.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy View Post
Some of them have also claimed that such products exist in USA and Australia. I read replies on one forum that this was untrue for USA
Yes and no. It really depends upon the provider. Some telcos (and especially some 3rd party DSL providers, that rent the "phone lines" from the telcos) will sell "Naked DSL" and some don't offer that option. My telco doesn't offer that option, but that doesn't mean that some don't.

NOTE: Most (USA) providers that offer "Naked DSL" do charge a little more for their "Naked DSL" offerings than they do for DSL riding with a telco/phone line (because they don't have the phone service subsidizing the costs of the wire). So some people have found that it's sometimes cheaper to get regular DSL with a minimal phone plan (and just not use the phone), vs paying extra for "Naked DSL". However, in most cases the costs of DSL+phone are still more expensive than the surcharge for "Naked DSL" (without any phone). And so if you really don't want/need the "phone", "Naked DSL" (if offered in your area) can sometimes be a good idea.
DracoFelis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-12-2007, 02:59 AM   #5
ctylor
 
ctylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 296
Thanks: 94
Thanked 53 Times in 27 Posts
ctylor will become famous soon enough
Default

Hence one reason to go with cable modem internet providers when using SIP as a phone replacement, so as to avoid buying a redudant phone line when getting your ADSL connection or the inflated surcharge given if you want naked DSL that inexplicably costs as much as what a plain phone line costs.
ctylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-12-2007, 01:09 PM   #6
andy
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 218
Thanks: 34
Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts
andy will become famous soon enough
Default

I understand the above comments

I think that proponents of the idea here want to compare British Telecom provision of a physical phoneline with cable suppliers' connections, but the latter includes probably a package of TV channels and broadband and maybe telephone for aggregate figures between maybe £20 and £35 a month [don't bother correcting me - no research].

Compared to revenue at that level, and notional cross-subsidies that are probably built in by the TV part being overpriced, we are being told that £5 a month might be possible on a simple phoneline with DSL only, but this is well below what the wholesale cost is claimed to be.

There needs to be some review of the way that the accountants allocate all the costs for it to be able to happen. Going back a few years, a friend who used to work in BT development told me the engineers had a lot of difficulty convincing the management that there was a business case for broadband at all, as they were paranoid about losing pstn revenues.
andy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-13-2007, 04:28 AM   #7
Tony
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 221
Thanks: 64
Thanked 106 Times in 49 Posts
Tony is a jewel in the roughTony is a jewel in the roughTony is a jewel in the rough
Default Engin to launch fast broadband without fixed-line fees

http://forum.voxalot.com/voip-news/1...ed-dsl-uk.html


Looks like Engin in Australia is going to lead the charge in offering broadband band services with out fixed line fees.

Tony.
Tony is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-09-2014, 05:09 PM   #8
Soruk
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Soruk is on a distinguished road
Default

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but something useful to UK VoIP users who would rather not be paying for the POTS line - Primus have slashed their cheapest line rental offering to £5.99/month - it's called Line Rental Saver and only available through Broadband Choices.

http://www.broadbandchoices.co.uk/of...s/primus-phone

I don't work for them - just a happy customer.
Soruk is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-21-2017, 03:19 AM   #9
maxanthony1976
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
maxanthony1976 is on a distinguished road
Default

Poor England. I do not pay anything for this.
maxanthony1976 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mobile Users Required martin Voxalot Support 47 10-15-2007 03:32 PM
Question to US- or Canada based users JeFFJuH Voxalot Support 1 04-25-2007 01:02 PM
Can i call to hotmail, gmail and yahoo users over voxalot? wycodreams Voxalot Support 1 04-25-2007 06:54 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.