|
Voxalot Support Support for the Voxalot service. |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-24-2008, 02:44 PM | #31 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 123 Thanked 369 Times in 282 Posts |
Quote:
In General iNum as it is helps in two directions: 1. Calls between users of various networks are now direct. We never did have much of a problem here at VoXalot with direct calls to Gizmo given SipBroker's integration. However take a TPad or BetaMax user, and they'd have to set up their ATA for SipBroker independently of the provider. With iNum it is a direct call. 2. If VoXBone manages to convice a few Telcos to terminate to these numbers, I suspect +883 will become a relatively big hit with Intl Roaming operators. Here's where VoXBone is likely to be looking for profits, as they'll charge the fee for terminating the calls. On that note, I also suspect that not getting listed in e164.arpa was not mean-spirited just an indication of the red-tape involved to get there. Quote:
Last edited by emoci; 12-24-2008 at 04:18 PM. |
||
12-24-2008, 05:11 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
Thanks: 13 Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts |
If you want to test calls to iNum numbers you may dial for free at least one of iNum local access numbers - 6468436969 (New York, NY USA) using Gizmo5 Backdoor Dialing.
Last edited by green; 12-24-2008 at 05:14 PM. |
12-24-2008, 09:38 PM | #33 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Alkmaar, The Netherlands
Posts: 6
Thanks: 3 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts |
Quote:
Voipbuster doesn't provides its users an INUM (not yet). Voipbuster says it is possible to phone an INUM (for free). And that is good because there are only a few providers in the world who opened their network for calling to +883-numbers. And indeed it is possible to call for free (even if you have no credit at all) via voipbuster. But the connection fails at the end. Last edited by klijnw; 12-24-2008 at 09:41 PM. |
|
12-25-2008, 01:06 AM | #34 | |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 447
Thanks: 4 Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts |
Quote:
883510000000091 is being routed to Voxalot as the privider by an explicit Dial Plan rule that looks for a prefix of '6'. A Dial Plan Test returns "A call to:6883510000000091 will get forwarded to 883510000000091 via Voxalot". |
|
12-25-2008, 02:19 AM | #35 | |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 123 Thanked 369 Times in 282 Posts |
Quote:
See http://forum.voxalot.com/voxalot-sup...html#post20579 At the moment creating a specific Dial Plan rule within VoXalot only gets in the way...you'll need to adjust your ATA dialplan instead to remove the 6 appropriately... |
|
12-25-2008, 04:14 AM | #36 | |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 447
Thanks: 4 Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts |
Quote:
I'm afraid that's not easily done as my entire Dial Plan design is based on the ATA prefixing everything it sends to Voxalot with a digit (0 - 9), except for things with a leading asterisk (i.e. Sip Broker and Speed Dial numbers). My PAP2 Dial Plan is: (*[x*].|<#:>x,x[x*].|<:0>x[x*].) This allows simple dialing to go to my primary VoIP provider for PSTN calls (default prefix 0), or to specify an alternate provider or destination by enterning #n first (#6 is Voxalot). Most #n combinations are already in use, including #8. Assuming there is going to be support for iNum via Voxalot as a provider in the near future, I'll hold off as I'm very happy with the flexibilty I have with my current Dial Plan design. Ron Last edited by Ron; 12-25-2008 at 04:16 AM. |
|
12-25-2008, 11:07 PM | #37 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bredene, Belgium
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 1 Posts |
Hi,
Quote:
The first option will however only work of other telco's agree to accept calls to +883 5100. However, as do I do not see any economic motivation for them to do so, I fear this will go the same way as the +3883 (ETNS). So, for the moment I see the "dialin" system as their main source of revenue. Concerning, voip calls, the main problem I have with iNum, is that the fact they are building a system next to the already existing one, confuses people. The big advantage of telephone-numbers is its clearity: You give somebody your phone-number and everybody knows how to reach you, by whatever network, anywhere in the world. As a voxalot user, we now now only have a sipbroker ID (*010xxxxx) and a E164 number: +882 99 ... (e164.org) and now an additional +883 5100 ... (inum). (PWD-users even have an additional +878 UPT-number). In essence, this is not a really issue, as long as all numbers work in all circumstances. However, that's not the case: the sipbroker and e164.org numbers will work in some cases, the inum-number only in some other cases. This confuses things. 99.999 % of the population has no idea what the differences is between sipbroker, e164.org, UPT and iNum. They just expects a telephone(number) to work, in all cases. If inum would have used e164.arpa, that would have been the case. Quote:
ENUM IAB Instructions (see also The RIPE NCC to Sign the e164.arpa (ENUM) Zone - News & Announcements from the RIPE NCC) Cheerio! Kr. Bonne. |
||
12-26-2008, 03:59 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
Thanks: 13 Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts |
I have a kind of feature request for Voxalot.
Let's imagine that my Voxalot number is 123456 and I'm calling Gizmo5 user using Voxalot & iNum numbering, so I'll dial something like +883 510 07 7654321 Currently this Gizmo5 subscriber will see my number presented as 123456. What will be the more desirable behavior is to present my number to the called party as +883 510 004 123456 |
12-27-2008, 11:36 AM | #39 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts |
Hello,
Dialing inum numbers from voipbuster works fine now. I have tried my inum numbers of voxeo and voxalot. Also the inum echo test (00883510000000091) works fine. Regards, zonljmv |
12-27-2008, 03:05 PM | #40 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Alkmaar, The Netherlands
Posts: 6
Thanks: 3 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts |
Dialing INUM numbers via voipbuster is not yet working perfectly. I can ring a Voxalot-phone now (by dialing via Voipbuster) but when I try to answer, it doesn't work. Voipbuster keeps on ringing and doesn't seem to notice that the phone is picked up already ... or I do something wrong??
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Voxalot and Sipura/ATA Tutorial: A Comprehensive Walkthrough | ctylor | Voxalot General | 5 | 04-28-2010 12:52 AM |
New user problems with Call Connection Rules | bdlhome | Voxalot Support | 12 | 09-10-2008 02:19 AM |
VoXaLot Launches European Server | Tony | Voxalot Support | 28 | 02-07-2007 07:15 AM |
Newbie - but please be nice | Mallycat | Voxalot Support | 21 | 04-15-2006 07:50 AM |