Thread: Busy Signal
View Single Post
Unread 07-13-2007, 10:52 PM   #9
martin
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,930
Thanks: 528
Thanked 646 Times in 340 Posts
martin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GLA313 View Post
This is the response that I got from LINK2VOIP...any comment?:

Andrew Green stated the following:

[andrew - Fri Jul 13 17:27:18 2007]:
> This is a major misunderstanding on his part (I think )...
>
> When we send a DID call to your server we send it to DID#@registered
> host via the registered and authenticated user. If you needed incoming
> calls to be from/to a user of 455447 then you should have created the
> Link2VoIP username as '455447' not 'AAA9999' which is your current
> username.
>
This is the way LINK2VOIP have chosen to implement their DIDs. That said, my comment still stands that SIP INVITEs should be sent to CONTACT passed in the registration:

See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt

10.2.1 Adding Bindings

Quote:
The REGISTER request sent to a registrar includes the contact
address(es) to which SIP requests for the address-of-record should be
forwarded.
The contact address sent by Voxalot contains the Voxalot username not the Link2VoIP username. Subsequent INVITES should be sent to the contact address Voxalot sends.
__________________
Martin

Please post support questions on the forum. Do not send PMs unless requested.
martin is offline   Reply With Quote