View Single Post
Unread 02-06-2007, 02:06 AM   #22
martin
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,930
Thanks: 528
Thanked 646 Times in 340 Posts
martin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the roughmartin is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctylor View Post
I am interested in making sure that Voxalot is not ever acting as an outbound proxy in case it detects my device cannot bypass Voxalot's NAT handling. I was curious if disabling "Enable symmetric NAT handling" (i.e. setting it to No) in my members details would have the effect of bypassing Voxalot acting as a middle-man in all situations it detects it is needed, and the calls either work or bust? I'd like to test to see if my STUN configuration is optimized or not.
Yes, setting this flag to "No" totally bypasses the NAT handling logic.
__________________
Martin

Please post support questions on the forum. Do not send PMs unless requested.
martin is offline   Reply With Quote